Example specsCheckout

Cut optional fields on the pay step

A checkout pay-step test that uses Choice Overload, Loss Aversion, and Risk Reversal so Pay is the only decision left on the screen.

Aim: Increase checkout completion by cutting optional fields

  • checkout
  • pay-step
  • choice-overload
  • loss-aversion
  • + 1 more

๐ŸŽฏ Hypothesis

  • If we strip optional fields from the pay step
  • By keeping only email and card, framing Pay as keeping free shipping, and putting the refund on the same row
  • Will more visitors complete checkout
  • Because Choice Overload removes extra decisions, Loss Aversion makes the CTA about what they keep, and Risk Reversal lowers the last hesitation

๐Ÿ”ฌ Research

Psychology / behavioural economics

  • Extra options slow the decision and raise abandonment; choice overload is the leak when company, coupon, and address sit in front of the card. - source
  • Losses weigh about twice equivalent gains, so loss aversion belongs in the Pay label ("Keep free shipping") rather than a generic verb. - source

Case studies

  • Large checkout studies still find more fields on the pay step than people will complete; cutting optional inputs is the reliable move. - source
  • GOV.UK service patterns put one job on the page so people can finish without ranking extras. - source

๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ Control

The existing UI for the pay step.

Control

โœจ Treatment

Removes company, billing address, and coupon from the pay step. Pay copy becomes "Keep free shipping ยท Pay $84.00", with a 30-day money-back line under the button.

<section class="pay">
  <label>Email <input type="email" value=""></label>
  <label>Card <input type="text" inputmode="numeric" value=""></label>
  <button type="button">Keep free shipping ยท Pay $84.00</button>
  <p>30-day money-back. Cancel anytime.</p>
</section>
.pay { max-width: 22rem; padding: 1.5rem; font: 16px/1.4 system-ui, sans-serif; }
.pay label { display: grid; gap: 0.35rem; margin: 0 0 0.85rem; font-size: 13px; color: #444; }
.pay input { height: 2.5rem; padding: 0 0.7rem; border: 1px solid #ccc; border-radius: 8px; }
.pay button { width: 100%; height: 2.75rem; border: 0; border-radius: 8px; background: #111; color: #fff; font-weight: 600; }
.pay p { margin: 0.75rem 0 0; font-size: 13px; color: #555; }

Treatment

๐Ÿ“Š Metrics

Primary metric

The deciding metric.

  • Checkout completion (%) โ€” share of pay-step visitors who successfully pay

Measurement metrics

Help explain the result.

  • Time to pay (avg) โ€” seconds from pay-step view to successful payment
  • Field error rate (%) โ€” share of pay-step visitors who see a validation error

Guardrail metrics

Must not regress during the experiment.

  • Support contacts about checkout (count) โ€” tickets tagged checkout or payment
  • Refund rate (%) โ€” share of completed orders refunded within 7 days

๐Ÿ“ˆ Results

Variant Visitors Conversions Conversion rate
Control TBD TBD TBD
Treatment TBD TBD TBD

โœ… Conclusion

Variant shipped to all users? Control / treatment

MAGE

Ready-to-run experiment tickets.

Upload a screen. Get a spec written like a growth engineer would write it.

Try MAGE
Cut optional fields on the pay step ยท MAGE